$STATEMENT-1$ For practical purposes, the earth is used as a reference at zero potential in electrical circuits.and
$STATEMENT-2$ The electrical potential of a sphere of radius $R$ with charge $\mathrm{Q}$ uniformly distributed on the surface is given by $\frac{\mathrm{Q}}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 R}$.
$STATEMENT-1$ is True, $STATEMENT-2$ is True; $STATEMENT-2$ is a correct explanation for $STATEMENT-1$
$STATEMENT-1$ is True, $STATEMENT-2$ is True; $STATEMENT-2$ is $NOT$ a correct explanation for $STATEMENT-1$
$STATEMENT -1$ is True, $STATEMENT-2$ is False
$STATEMENT -1$ is False, $STATEMENT-2$ is True
Assertion : Two concentric charged shells are given. The potential difference between the shells depends on charge of inner shell.
Reason : Potential due to charge of outer shell remains same at every point inside the sphere.
Consider two points $1$ and $2$ in a region outside a charged sphere. Two points are not very far away from the sphere. If $E$ and $V$ represent the electric field vector and the electric potential, which of the following is not possible
A thin spherical shell is charged by some source. The potential difference between the two points $C$ and $P$ (in $V$) shown in the figure is:
(Take $\frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0}=9 \times 10^9$ $SI$ units)
A conducting sphere of radius $R$ is given a charge $Q$. The electric potential and the electric field at the centre of the sphere respectively are
Ten charges are placed on the circumference of a circle of radius $R$ with constant angular separation between successive charges. Alternate charges $1,3,5,7,9$ have charge $(+q)$ each, while $2,4,6,8,10$ have charge $(-q)$ each. The potential $V$ and the electric field $E$ at the centre of the circle are respectively
(Take $V =0$ at infinity $)$