$v-t$ graph of an object of mass $1\,\, kg$ is shown
$v-t$ graph of an object of mass $1\,\, kg$ is shown
- A
net work done on the object in $30\,\, sec$ is zero.
- B
the average acceleration of the object is zero.
- C
the average force on the object is zero.
- D
All of the above
Similar Questions
A person walks $25.0^{\circ}$ north of east for $3.18 \,km$. How far would she have to walk due north and then due east to arrive at the same location?
A person walks $25.0^{\circ}$ north of east for $3.18 \,km$. How far would she have to walk due north and then due east to arrive at the same location?
- [KVPY 2016]
Write equations of motion for uniformly acceletated motion in plane ?
Write equations of motion for uniformly acceletated motion in plane ?
$Y $ component of velocity is $20$ and $X$ component of velocity is $10$. The direction of motion of the body with the horizontal at this instant is
A body throws a ball upwards with velocity $v_0 = 20\, m/s$ . The wind imparts a horizontal acceleration of $4\, m/s^2$ to the ball. The angle $\theta $ from vertical at which the ball must be thrown so that the ball returns to the boy's hand is $(g = 10\, m/s^2)$
A body throws a ball upwards with velocity $v_0 = 20\, m/s$ . The wind imparts a horizontal acceleration of $4\, m/s^2$ to the ball. The angle $\theta $ from vertical at which the ball must be thrown so that the ball returns to the boy's hand is $(g = 10\, m/s^2)$
A vector has both magnitude and direction. Does it mean that anything that has magnitude and direction is necessarily a vector? The rotation of a body can be specified by the direction of the axis of rotation, and the angle of rotation about the axis. Does that make any rotation a vector?
A vector has both magnitude and direction. Does it mean that anything that has magnitude and direction is necessarily a vector? The rotation of a body can be specified by the direction of the axis of rotation, and the angle of rotation about the axis. Does that make any rotation a vector?