The binding energy of the electron in a hydrogen atom is $13.6\, eV$, the energy required to remove the electron from the first excited state of $Li^{++}$ is ......... $eV$
The binding energy of the electron in a hydrogen atom is $13.6\, eV$, the energy required to remove the electron from the first excited state of $Li^{++}$ is ......... $eV$
- A
$122.4$
- B
$30.6$
- C
$13.6$
- D
$3.4$
Similar Questions
The wavelength of the first line of Balmer series of hydrogen atom is $\lambda \,\mathop A\limits^o $. The wavelength of this line of a double ionised lithium atom $(Z = 3)$is
The wavelength of the first line of Balmer series of hydrogen atom is $\lambda \,\mathop A\limits^o $. The wavelength of this line of a double ionised lithium atom $(Z = 3)$is
To accommodate the view that matter is made up to $5$ elements only, a scientist proposed the following hypothesis; that atoms can have a maximum principal quantum number $n _{\operatorname{man}}$ and no higher. Then, which of the following statements must be true ?
To accommodate the view that matter is made up to $5$ elements only, a scientist proposed the following hypothesis; that atoms can have a maximum principal quantum number $n _{\operatorname{man}}$ and no higher. Then, which of the following statements must be true ?
- [KVPY 2021]
Answer the following questions, which help you understand the difference between Thomson's model and Rutherford's model better.
$(a)$ Is the average angle of deflection of $\alpha$ -particles by a thin gold foil predicted by Thomson's model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?
$(b)$ Is the probability of backward scattering (i.e., scattering of $\alpha$ -particles at angles greater than $90^{\circ}$ ) predicted by Thomson's model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?
$(c)$ Keeping other factors fixed, it is found experimentally that for small thickness $t,$ the number of $\alpha$ -particles scattered at moderate angles is proportional to $t$. What clue does this linear dependence on $t$ provide?
$(d)$ In which model is it completely wrong to ignore multiple scattering for the calculation of average angle of scattering of $\alpha$ -particles by a thin foil?
Answer the following questions, which help you understand the difference between Thomson's model and Rutherford's model better.
$(a)$ Is the average angle of deflection of $\alpha$ -particles by a thin gold foil predicted by Thomson's model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?
$(b)$ Is the probability of backward scattering (i.e., scattering of $\alpha$ -particles at angles greater than $90^{\circ}$ ) predicted by Thomson's model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?
$(c)$ Keeping other factors fixed, it is found experimentally that for small thickness $t,$ the number of $\alpha$ -particles scattered at moderate angles is proportional to $t$. What clue does this linear dependence on $t$ provide?
$(d)$ In which model is it completely wrong to ignore multiple scattering for the calculation of average angle of scattering of $\alpha$ -particles by a thin foil?
What radioactive source did the Geiger and Marsden use in the scattering experiment?
What radioactive source did the Geiger and Marsden use in the scattering experiment?
Apply Bohr’s atomic model to a lithium atom. Assuming that its two $K$-shell electrons are too close to nucleus such that nucleus and $K$-shell electron act as a nucleus of effective positive charge equivalent to electron. The ionization energy of its outermost electron is......$eV$
Apply Bohr’s atomic model to a lithium atom. Assuming that its two $K$-shell electrons are too close to nucleus such that nucleus and $K$-shell electron act as a nucleus of effective positive charge equivalent to electron. The ionization energy of its outermost electron is......$eV$