Classically, an electron can be in any orbit around the nucleus of an atom. Then what determines the typical atomic size? Why is an atom not, say, thousand times bigger than its typical size? The question had greatly puzzled Bohr before he arrived at his famous model of the atom that you have learnt in the text. To simulate what he might well have done before his discovery, let us play as follows with the basic constants of nature and see if we can get a quantity with the dimensions of length that is roughly equal to the known size of an atom $\left(\sim 10^{-10} \;m \right)$

$(a)$ Construct a quantity with the dimensions of length from the fundamental constants $e, m_{e},$ and $c .$ Determine its numerical value.

$(b)$ You will find that the length obtained in $(a)$ is many orders of magnitude smaller than the atomic dimensions. Further, it involves $c .$ But energies of atoms are mostly in non-relativistic domain where $c$ is not expected to play any role. This is what may have suggested Bohr to discard $c$ and look for 'something else' to get the right atomic size. Now, the Planck's constant $h$ had already made its appearance elsewhere. Bohr's great insight lay in recognising that $h, m_{e},$ and $e$ will yield the right atomic size. Construct a quantity with the dimension of length from $h m_e$, and $e$ and confirm that its numerical value has indeed the correct order of magnitude.

Vedclass pdf generator app on play store
Vedclass iOS app on app store

$(a)$ Charge on an electron, $=1.6 \times 10^{-19}\, C$

Mass Of an electron, $m_{e}=9.1 \times 10^{-31} \,kg$

Speed of light, $c=3 \times 10^{8} \,m / s$

The quantity having dimensions of length and involving the given quantities is $\left(\frac{e^{2}}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} m_{e} c^{2}}\right)$ Where,

$\epsilon_{0}=$ Permittivity of free space And,

$\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}}=9 \times 10^{9}\, Nm ^{2} C ^{-2}$

The numerical value of the taken quantity will be

$\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \times \frac{e^{2}}{m_{e} c^{2}}$

$=9 \times 10^{9} \times \frac{\left(1.6 \times 10^{-19}\right)^{2}}{9.1 \times 10^{-31} \times\left(3 \times 10^{8}\right)^{2}}$

$=2.81 \times 10^{-15} \,m$

Hence, the numerical value of the taken quantity is much smaller than the typical size of an atom.

$(b)$ charge on an electron, $e=1.6 \times 10^{-19} \,C$

Mass of an electron, $m_{e}=9.1 \times 10^{-31} \,kg$

Planck's constant, $h=6.63 \times 10^{-34} \,Js$

Let us take a quantity involving the given quantities as $\frac{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}\left(\frac{h^{2}}{2 \pi}\right)}{m_{e} e^{2}}$

Where, $\quad \epsilon_{0}=$ Permittivity of free space And,

$\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}}=9 \times 10^{9} \,Nm ^{2} C ^{-2}$

The numerical value of the taken quantity will be

$4 \pi \epsilon_{0} \times \frac{\left(\frac{h}{2 \pi}\right)^{2}}{m_{0} e^{2}}$

$=\frac{1}{9 \times 10^{9}} \times \frac{\left(\frac{6.63 \times 10^{-34}}{2 \times 3.14}\right)^{2}}{9.1 \times 10^{-31} \times\left(1.6 \times 10^{-19}\right)^{2}}$

$=0.53 \times 10^{-10} \,m$

Hence, the value of the quantity taken is of the order of the atomic size.

Similar Questions

The wavelength of the first line of Lyman series for hydrogen atom is equal to that of the second line of Balmer series for a hydrogen like ion. The atomic number $Z$ of hydrogen like ion is

Difference between nth and $(n +1)^{th}$ Bohr’s radius of $‘H’$ atom is equal to it’s $(n-1)^{th}$ Bohr’s radius. the value of $n$ is:

The diagram below shows the lowest four energy levels for an electron in a hypothetical atom.The electron is excited to the $-1\,eV$ level of the atom and transitions to the lowest energy state by emitting only two photons. Which of the following energies could not belong to either of the photons ? .....$eV$

Show the trajectory of $\alpha -$ particle of different impact parameter and using it how did Rutherford determine the upper limit of the nuclear size ? 

In Bohr model of hydrogen atom, the force on the electron depends on the principal quantum number as