Statement $-1 :$ $\sim (p \leftrightarrow \sim q)$ is equivalent to $p\leftrightarrow q $
Statement $-2 :$ $\sim (p \leftrightarrow \sim q)$ s a tautology
Statement $-1$ is true, Statement $-2$ is true; Statement $-2$ is a correct explanation for Statement $-1$
Statement $-1$ is true, Statement $-2$ is true; Statement $-2$ is not a correct explanation for Statement $-1$
Statement $-1$ is false, Statement $-2$ is true
Statement $-1$ is true, Statement $-2$ is false
For the statements $p$ and $q$, consider the following compound statements :
$(a)$ $(\sim q \wedge( p \rightarrow q )) \rightarrow \sim p$
$(b)$ $((p \vee q) \wedge \sim p) \rightarrow q$
Then which of the following statements is correct?
Which of the following Boolean expressions is not a tautology ?
Given the following two statements :
$\left( S _{1}\right):( q \vee p ) \rightarrow( p \leftrightarrow \sim q )$ is a tautology.
$\left( S _{2}\right): \sim q \wedge(\sim p \leftrightarrow q )$ is a fallacy.
Then
Consider the following statements
$P :$ Suman is brilliant
$Q :$ Suman is rich
$R :$ Suman is honest
The negation of the statement "Suman is brilliant and dishonest if and only if Suman is rich" can be expressed as
The statement $(p \wedge(\sim q) \vee((\sim p) \wedge q) \vee((\sim p) \wedge(\sim q))$ is equivalent to