You are repeating the Hershey-Chase experiment and are provided with two isotopes: $^{32}P$ and $^{15}N$ (in place of $^{35}S$ in the original experiment). How do you expect your results to be different ?
Use of ${ }^{15} \mathrm{~N}$ will be inappropriate because method of detection of ${ }^{35} \mathrm{P}$ and ${ }^{15} \mathrm{~N}$ is different $\left({ }^{32} \mathrm{P}\right.$ being a radioactive isotope while ${ }^{15} \mathrm{~N}$ is not radioactive but is the heavier isotope of Nitrogen). Even if ${ }^{15} \mathrm{~N}$ was radioactive then its presence would have been detected both inside the cell ${ }^{15} \mathrm{~N}$ incorporated as nitrogenous base in $DNA$) as well as in the supernatant because ${ }^{15} \mathrm{~N}$ would also get incorporated in amino group of amino acids in proteins). Hence the use of ${ }^{15} \mathrm{~N}$ would not give any conclusive results.
Unequivocal proof that DNA is the genetic material was first proposed by
How did Hershey and Chase differentiate between $DNA$ and protein in their experiment while proving that $DNA$ is the genetic material?
A molecule that can act as a genetic material having characteristics .........
The unequivocal proof of $DNA$ as the genetic material came from the studies on a
$A :$ DNase can inhibit the process of transformation.
$R :$ Transformation is absorption of $DNA$ segment from the surrounding medium by a living bacterium