Consider
Statement $-1 :$$\left( {p \wedge \sim q} \right) \wedge \left( { \sim p \wedge q} \right)$ is a fallacy.
Statement $-2 :$$(p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow ( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p )$ is a tautology.
Statement $-1$ is false, Statement $-2$ is true
Statement $-1$ is true, Statement $-2$ is false
Statement $-1$ is true, Statement $-2$ is true; Statement $-2$ is a correct explanation for Statement $-1$
Statement $-1$ is true, Statement $-2$ is true; Statement $-2$ is not a correct explanation for Statement $-1$
The negation of the statement
"If I become a teacher, then I will open a school", is
Negation of “Ram is in Class $X$ or Rashmi is in Class $XII$” is
The compound statement $(\sim( P \wedge Q )) \vee((\sim P ) \wedge Q ) \Rightarrow((\sim P ) \wedge(\sim Q ))$ is equivalent to
If $A$ : Lotuses are Pink and $B$ : The Earth is a planet. Then the
verbal translation of $\left( { \sim A} \right) \vee B$ is
Let $p , q , r$ be three statements such that the truth value of $( p \wedge q ) \rightarrow(\sim q \vee r )$ is $F$. Then the truth values of $p , q , r$ are respectively