Consider

Statement $-1 :$$\left( {p \wedge \sim q} \right) \wedge \left( { \sim p \wedge q} \right)$ is a fallacy.

Statement $-2 :$$(p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow ( \sim q \rightarrow   \sim  p )$  is a tautology.

  • [AIEEE 2009]
  • [JEE MAIN 2013]
  • A

    Statement $-1$ is false, Statement $-2$ is true

  • B

    Statement $-1$ is true, Statement $-2$ is false

  • C

    Statement $-1$ is true, Statement $-2$ is true; Statement $-2$ is a correct explanation for Statement $-1$

  • D

    Statement $-1$ is true, Statement $-2$ is true; Statement $-2$ is not a correct explanation for Statement $-1$

Similar Questions

Contrapositive of the statement:

'If a function $f$ is differentiable at $a$, then it is also continuous at $a$', is

  • [JEE MAIN 2020]

$\sim (p \Leftrightarrow q)$ is

The statement $p \to ( q \to p)$ is equivalent to

  • [JEE MAIN 2013]

The contrapositive of the following statement, "If the side of a square doubles, then its area increases four times", is

  • [JEE MAIN 2016]

The negation of the expression $q \vee((\sim q) \wedge p)$ is equivalent to

  • [JEE MAIN 2023]