Consider

Statement $-1 :$$\left( {p \wedge \sim q} \right) \wedge \left( { \sim p \wedge q} \right)$ is a fallacy.

Statement $-2 :$$(p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow ( \sim q \rightarrow   \sim  p )$  is a tautology.

  • [AIEEE 2009]
  • [JEE MAIN 2013]
  • A

    Statement $-1$ is false, Statement $-2$ is true

  • B

    Statement $-1$ is true, Statement $-2$ is false

  • C

    Statement $-1$ is true, Statement $-2$ is true; Statement $-2$ is a correct explanation for Statement $-1$

  • D

    Statement $-1$ is true, Statement $-2$ is true; Statement $-2$ is not a correct explanation for Statement $-1$

Similar Questions

The negation of the statement

"If I become a teacher, then I will open a school", is

  • [AIEEE 2012]

Negation of “Ram is in Class $X$ or Rashmi is in Class $XII$” is

The compound statement $(\sim( P \wedge Q )) \vee((\sim P ) \wedge Q ) \Rightarrow((\sim P ) \wedge(\sim Q ))$ is equivalent to

  • [JEE MAIN 2023]

If $A$ : Lotuses are Pink and $B$ : The Earth is a planet. Then the
verbal translation of $\left( { \sim A} \right) \vee B$ is

Let $p , q , r$ be three statements such that the truth value of $( p \wedge q ) \rightarrow(\sim q \vee r )$ is $F$. Then the truth values of $p , q , r$ are respectively

  • [JEE MAIN 2020]