In the Rutherford experiment, $\alpha -$ particles are scattered from a nucleus as shown. Out of the four paths, which path is not possible?
In the Rutherford experiment, $\alpha -$ particles are scattered from a nucleus as shown. Out of the four paths, which path is not possible?
- [AIEEE 2012]
- A
$D$
- B
$B$
- C
$C$
- D
$A$
Similar Questions
In Rutherford's experiment, number of particles scattered at $90^{\circ}$ angle are $x$ per second. Number particles scattered per second at angle $60^{\circ}$ is
In Rutherford's experiment, number of particles scattered at $90^{\circ}$ angle are $x$ per second. Number particles scattered per second at angle $60^{\circ}$ is
The following diagram indicates the energy levels of a certain atom when the system moves from $2E$ level to $E$, emitting a photon of wavelength $\lambda $. The wavelength of photon produced during its transition from $\frac{4E}{3}$ level to $E$ is
The following diagram indicates the energy levels of a certain atom when the system moves from $2E$ level to $E$, emitting a photon of wavelength $\lambda $. The wavelength of photon produced during its transition from $\frac{4E}{3}$ level to $E$ is
What is head-on collision ? For that tell the impact parameter.
What is head-on collision ? For that tell the impact parameter.
What is impact parameter ?
What is impact parameter ?
Classically, an electron can be in any orbit around the nucleus of an atom. Then what determines the typical atomic size? Why is an atom not, say, thousand times bigger than its typical size? The question had greatly puzzled Bohr before he arrived at his famous model of the atom that you have learnt in the text. To simulate what he might well have done before his discovery, let us play as follows with the basic constants of nature and see if we can get a quantity with the dimensions of length that is roughly equal to the known size of an atom $\left(\sim 10^{-10} \;m \right)$
$(a)$ Construct a quantity with the dimensions of length from the fundamental constants $e, m_{e},$ and $c .$ Determine its numerical value.
$(b)$ You will find that the length obtained in $(a)$ is many orders of magnitude smaller than the atomic dimensions. Further, it involves $c .$ But energies of atoms are mostly in non-relativistic domain where $c$ is not expected to play any role. This is what may have suggested Bohr to discard $c$ and look for 'something else' to get the right atomic size. Now, the Planck's constant $h$ had already made its appearance elsewhere. Bohr's great insight lay in recognising that $h, m_{e},$ and $e$ will yield the right atomic size. Construct a quantity with the dimension of length from $h m_e$, and $e$ and confirm that its numerical value has indeed the correct order of magnitude.
Classically, an electron can be in any orbit around the nucleus of an atom. Then what determines the typical atomic size? Why is an atom not, say, thousand times bigger than its typical size? The question had greatly puzzled Bohr before he arrived at his famous model of the atom that you have learnt in the text. To simulate what he might well have done before his discovery, let us play as follows with the basic constants of nature and see if we can get a quantity with the dimensions of length that is roughly equal to the known size of an atom $\left(\sim 10^{-10} \;m \right)$
$(a)$ Construct a quantity with the dimensions of length from the fundamental constants $e, m_{e},$ and $c .$ Determine its numerical value.
$(b)$ You will find that the length obtained in $(a)$ is many orders of magnitude smaller than the atomic dimensions. Further, it involves $c .$ But energies of atoms are mostly in non-relativistic domain where $c$ is not expected to play any role. This is what may have suggested Bohr to discard $c$ and look for 'something else' to get the right atomic size. Now, the Planck's constant $h$ had already made its appearance elsewhere. Bohr's great insight lay in recognising that $h, m_{e},$ and $e$ will yield the right atomic size. Construct a quantity with the dimension of length from $h m_e$, and $e$ and confirm that its numerical value has indeed the correct order of magnitude.