The statement $[(p \wedge q) \rightarrow p] \rightarrow (q \wedge \sim q)$ is
tautology
contradiction
open statement
neither tautology nor contradiction
Consider the following two propositions:
$P_1: \sim( p \rightarrow \sim q )$
$P_2:( p \wedge \sim q ) \wedge((\sim p ) \vee q )$
If the proposition $p \rightarrow((\sim p ) \vee q )$ is evaluated as $FALSE$, then
The number of choices of $\Delta \in\{\wedge, \vee, \Rightarrow, \Leftrightarrow\}$, such that $( p \Delta q ) \Rightarrow(( p \Delta \sim q ) \vee((\sim p ) \Delta q ))$ is a tautology, is
The statement $p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow p)$ is equivalent to
Let,$p$ : Ramesh listens to music.
$q :$ Ramesh is out of his village
$r :$ It is Sunday
$s :$ It is Saturday
Then the statement "Ramesh listens to music only if he is in his village and it is Sunday or Saturday"can be expressed as.
Negation of the statement $(p \vee r) \Rightarrow(q \vee r)$ is :