The statement $p \to ( q \to p)$ is equivalent to
$p \to q$
$p\, \to \,(p \vee q)$
$p\, \to \,(p \to q)$
$p\, \to \,(p \wedge q)$
Among the two statements
$(S1):$ $( p \Rightarrow q ) \wedge( q \wedge(\sim q ))$ is a contradiction and
$( S 2):( p \wedge q ) \vee((\sim p ) \wedge q ) \vee$
$( p \wedge(\sim q )) \vee((\sim p ) \wedge(\sim q ))$ is a tautology
Statement$-I :$ $\sim (p\leftrightarrow q)$ is equivalent to $(p\wedge \sim q)\vee \sim (p\vee \sim q) .$
Statement$-II :$ $p\rightarrow (p\rightarrow q)$ is a tautology.
Which statement given below is tautology ?
The inverse of the proposition $(p\; \wedge \sim q) \Rightarrow r$ is
$\sim (p \wedge q)$ is equal to .....