Let $\Delta, \nabla \in\{\wedge, \vee\}$ be such that $( p \rightarrow q ) \Delta( p \nabla q )$ is a tautology. Then

The propositions $(p \Rightarrow \;\sim p) \wedge (\sim p \Rightarrow p)$ is a

Which of the following is not logically equivalent to the proposition : “A real number is either rational or irrational”.

Statement $-1$ : The statement $A \to (B \to A)$ is equivalent to $A \to \left( {A \vee B} \right)$.

Statement $-2$ : The statement $ \sim \left[ {\left( {A \wedge B} \right) \to \left( { \sim A \vee B} \right)} \right]$ is a Tautology

Negation of $(p \Rightarrow q) \Rightarrow(q \Rightarrow p)$ is

Consider

Statement $-1 :$$\left( {p \wedge \sim q} \right) \wedge \left( { \sim p \wedge q} \right)$ is a fallacy.

Statement $-2 :$$(p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow ( \sim q \rightarrow   \sim  p )$  is a tautology.